AI is not going to take your writing jobs
Shakespeare isn’t a very good writer, a fellow student once remarked in an English class. His work is sloppy! One cliche after another is present.
Certainly, the teenager at the time may have been excused for believing that William Shakespeare had essentially “phoned it in.” His plays are full of terms that have become overused. Just a few quotes from “Hamlet” include “my own flesh and blood,” “cruel to be kind,” and “method to my madness.”
But prior to Shakespeare, those anecdotes weren’t cliches. They didn’t exist until everyone noticed how creative and moving his use of language was and couldn’t help but embrace it.
To understand where generative AI is going and what opportunities and challenges it may pose for the future of human composition, it is essential to understand the difference between twisting a phrase and stealing one.
Will content writers be replaced by AI ChatGPT?
Large-language models, or generative AI systems, are becoming more adept at creating compositions based on complicated, very precise demands. Examples of these systems are Google’s Bard and OpenAI’s ChatGPT.
They take inspiration from previously published work and use it to quickly put together documents of any kind, including term papers and manuscripts like those written by Shakespeare.
Despite its early mistakes, which have been well-documented, generative AI is an unquestionably disruptive, transformational technology that will impact a variety of white-collar occupations, including those in the legal, medical, academic, and even tourism sectors. also writing.
Can computers write as well as people?
Humans will continue to be at the top of the food-for-thought chain due to AI’s limitations. A human can be both a lender and a borrower, to borrow a Shakespearean phrase. On the other hand, generative AI can only borrow from humanity.
For all the material it can produce, it just lacks the ability to come up with original, novel expressions and observations. For that, it requires us.
Can a computer program AI make mistakes?
ChatGPT, the Kleenex of generative AI systems, has produced some jaw-dropping gaffes when writers have poked them. AI acquires connections and associations in a very different way than humans. It can be quite challenging for AI to understand something that is so basic for humans to understand, like my reference to Kleenex.
The technology will advance in step with the number of errors we find. However, the danger of misreads that lead generative AI to confidently drive off a cliff will never completely vanish. So we won’t ever give the keys to anyone.
Speaking of keys, in many applications, AI has a history of falling short of complete autonomy. similar to autonomous vehicles. Many well-known automakers anticipated that autonomous vehicles would be commonplace by 2021 in 2016. Even interior designs without steering wheels were being considered by several manufacturers.
That obviously didn’t occur and presumably won’t in the future. With the exception of Tesla, several automakers have since curtailed or abandoned development. However, AI is taking on particular duties that improve our ability to drive. If we don’t react quickly enough, it can brake and notify us of potential dangers. It can even be used to drive through tedious, well-lit stretches of highway or parallel park.
A similar strategy is being used in radiology.
On X-rays and MRIs, AI is quite adept at identifying some anomalies. In addition, fresh combinations of angles and tones on an image will constantly exist, which could confuse the technology. Therefore, even while radiologists are using AI more and more for the activities it excels at, they are still maintaining control. The radiologists have the final say.
That is the model I anticipate taking shape for writers. For any task, Bing AI, Microsoft’s ChatGPT-based solution, and Bard are excellent starting points. They can aid in highlighting pertinent problems and making structural suggestions.
I ought to have listened to my own advice. I just invited Bard and ChatGPT to create essays about the future of writing in the face of generative AI, and both of them did a good job. Many of the issues I’ve brought up here were mentioned by them.
However, I have been writing continuously for days. It only took the AI 10 seconds. Very startling. Evidently, generative AI presents both a chance and a danger. Which one, in reality, is up to us to decide. There is nothing good or bad, to quote Hamlet from Shakespeare. However, thinking makes it true.
Read more: BEST CHEAP RESTAURANTS OF HAWAII ARE LOCATED IN WAIKIKI
